|
ANIMAL RIGHTS vs ANIMAL WELFARE what you must learn
Most pet owners are not aware that “Animal Rights” (AR) and “Animal Welfare” organizations endorse opposing agendas.
Katie GammillNot only are the “Rights” and “Welfare” philosophies separated by irreconcilable differences, miss-information
supplied by Animal Rights Organizations retards the advancement of animal welfare. Animal Rights organizations change city
codes to make us “animal guardians” instead of owners, thus removing property rights afforded under the Constitution.
E. Katie Gammill © TheDogPlace March 2010 - In order to better understand which organizations support your beliefs,
please read and share this with your local and state representatives.
ANIMAL WELFARE:
ü Supports humane use, treatment, and a responsibility to care for animals;
ü Supports humane treatment and responsible care of animals used for service, research, food, and education;
ü Supports zoos, sanctuaries, animal shelters, and animals kept by pet owners.
ANIMAL RIGHTS (AR):
ü Organizations are based on “moral” and “ethical” philosophies;
ü Espouse humane care but ONLY until animals can be removed from human use;
ü Believe “A BOY is a CAT is a RAT is a DOG.” Quote by PETA, People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals.
PETA cares no more about people than it does for rats.
ü Organizations say humans have NO RIGHT to use, breed, or eat any species.
PETA is just one “Animal Rights” organization that reacted with unfettered glee at the Fox Hunting Ban in England.
They view it as an important achievement in the history of the animal rights movement.
Did you know arson, property destruction, burglary, and theft are “acceptable crimes” to animal rights advocates?
“Animal Rights” leaders and grassroots organizations are adept at blurring the lines between “Rights” and “Welfare”.
They force legislation for mandatory spay/neutering, and laws that change the legal status of animals as no longer your property.
They demand premature spaying and neutering, which is linked to compromised immune systems and other health issues.
Spaying and neutering should be done appropriately and hobby and show breeders should automatically be exempt from
such forced laws. Our problem is not over-population. It is a pet distribution problem. Mandatory sterilization violates the
responsible owner’s right to produce a litter while at the same time, many shelters import “street dogs” from foreign countries
introducing new diseases and social problems.
Many legislators and public officials pass restrictive laws because they don’t understand the difference between “Animal Rights”
and “Animal Welfare”. When breeds, rather than individual dogs, are labeled as dangerous, families risk seizure of their pets du
to unrealistic regulations or loss of homeowner’s insurance coverage.
Funding should go toward promoting responsible ownership, not elimination of animal ownership. Ethics and responsible
ownership is achieved only through education.
~ E Katie Gammill
#2
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals may have a widely recognized acronym but there are things
about this non-profit that may rattle your cage!
Nel Liquorman, Health Editor / © TheDogPress 01|13|10 - The ASPCA is not your local SPCA. Although the names appea
very similar, they are completely separate entities. Let's unscramble the acronyms.
NEL ON RECALLED, RECYCLED, COUNTERFEIT DOG FOODThe ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center (APCC)
is not the AAPCC (1) although the acronym appears the same at first glance, nor is it the animal equivalent of the CDC (2)
for the human population. The first is an association of centers and provides very little help or poison information.
Nel Liquorman, Health Editor / © TheDogPress 01|13|10 - The ASPCA is not your local SPCA. Although the names appea
r very similar, they are completely separate entities. Let's unscramble the acronyms.
NEL ON RECALLED, RECYCLED, COUNTERFEIT DOG FOODThe ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center (APCC)
is not the AAPCC (1) although the acronym appears the same at first glance, nor is it the animal equivalent of the CDC (2)
for the human population. The first is an association of centers and provides very little help or poison information.
The CDC has doctors, scientists, researchers and laboratory personnel. It is a government agency with facilities around the
country. Experts can prove their findings, locate the poisons, and help to prevent the problem or disease from spreading.
The best national number to call in an emergency is 1-800-222-1222 which is the National Capitol Poison Control Center (3)
It is a free service and the website has free information.
The ASPCA APCC keeps records of reported and diagnosed poisonings that occurred in animals. The records are created by
way of the FOR A FEE phones calls to the APCC or, we assume, by affiliated vets furnishing info to APCC.
The ASPCA APCC appears to be little more than a phone line with a veterinarian on call and a database. Could the lack o
diagnostics and research facilities amount to taking an educated guess? We must wonder if a high school kid, a computer
and the same database, could come up with the same answers.
You might be surprised to learn that the ASPCA sells products, appears to endorse some commercial products, sells pet insurance
, and offers credit cards. Yet they do not seem to be spending money on research for animal poisonings or disease.
According to one of their websites, the ASPCA operates Bergh Animal Hospital and a shelter in New York City.
Their hospital is highly rated and the work of the ASPCA has gotten a lot of good press on Animal Planet Animal Cops.
The ASPCA has a database of animal shelters which leads many people to believe that they support shelters around the
country. However, if you read the small print, you will see a little disclaimer that states that the shelters listed are not accredited
, inspected, endorsed by or affiliated with the ASPCA
Looking an awful lot like a marketing group, the ASPCA may be misleading consumers while skirting laws meant
to protect the public from misleading endorsement of products by a non-profit organization. Why would they be so
willing to endorse products and so unwilling to endorse animal shelters? We must believe that money is the motivating factor.
How can this organization operate in both the profit and the non-profit arena at the same time? Has this ever been addressed
by the Attorney General of the State of New York? The ASPCA boasts that their lobbyists are stationed around the country
helping to get animal laws passed. If they are using a war chest of donated dollars to pass laws on people in other states, how do
we define them? As a political machine perhaps?
Unless you are a vegan and want all animals set free, should you worry? Regarding meat, the ASPCA carefully states that it is a
“personal and private determination” but the animal rights position reads loud and clear … “however, the ASPCA firmly believes
that animals who are bred, raised and killed or harvested for human consumption, like all animals, are entitled to protection from
distress and suffering during their lives and at the time of their deaths.”
Regarding breeders, the ASPCA states “Because there are homeless pets awaiting adoption in every community in the nation,
the ASPCA strongly advocates that persons wishing to acquire a dog consider adopting one from a shelter or other source o
f homeless animals. Those who are committed to acquiring a specific breed of dog should contact their local chapter of the
breed’s rescue group or locate a responsible breeder.”
If these few facts lead you to believe that ASPCA is a powerful anti-pet/anti-meat lobbying group, then you should worry.
Reasonable citizens need to call for changes in how non-profits are allowed to operate, and they need to do it now!
AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE L LINK YOU CAN READ ALL ABOUT THE PET FOOD ISSUES
AT THE FREE SUBSCRITION EMAIL PAGE
Investigative Reports on Deadly Dog Food are in sequential order
|